Google+ Followers

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Tinkering and Hammering Out Equations

This is how it's done.

So, you're wondering, "hey, exactly how are you going to crank out these equations people have been looking for for likely hundreds of years over the next few months?"  Well, just like I said way back in the beginning of the blog, we'll do it the old fashioned way, and that is step by step.

Alternative method:


The Surfer, OM-IV

Monday, August 15, 2016

We're Calculating Masses of Fundamental Particles Now!!!



We can now calculate, from first principles and fundamental Planck units, the mass of blackholes, protons, and electrons. (link to post about new electron holographic solution)

The proton actually is a fundamental particle as well.  The Standard Model considers that the proton is composed of quarks, thus not fundamental.  

So, now, what about all of the other fundamental particles?  Can we also calculate their masses and predict all their masses correctly, and predict masses of other unknown particles?

For all the success of The Standard Model, it is incomplete, and, while it works very well for some things (QED, QCD, etc), it has issues.

Anyway, we can now calculate the mass of one of the elementary particles in the table above, the electron.  It seems then like the muon or tau particle would be the appropriate particle to target next to see if we can calculate its mass, and perhaps along the way determine or demonstrate exactly what works and what does not work with "The Standard Model" way of looking at things.

For now, we will list the masses of the first three leptons:
electron mass  $m_{\rm e}$
 Value 9.109 383 56 x 10-31 kg
 Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 11 x 10-31 kg
  Relative standard uncertainty  1.2 x 10-8
 Concise form 9.109 383 56(11) x 10-31 kg    

muon mass  $m_{\rm \mu}$
 Value 1.883 531 594 x 10-28 kg
 Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 048 x 10-28 kg
  Relative standard uncertainty  2.5 x 10-8
 Concise form 1.883 531 594(48) x 10-28 kg    

tau mass  $m_{\rm \tau}$
 Value 3.167 47 x 10-27 kg
 Standard uncertainty 0.000 29 x 10-27 kg
  Relative standard uncertainty  9.0 x 10-5
 Concise form 3.167 47(29) x 10-27 kg    

And their relative mass ratios:

muon-electron mass ratio  $m_{\rm \mu}/m_{\rm e}$
 Value 206.768 2826


tau-electron mass ratio  $m_{\rm \tau}/m_{\rm e}$
 Value 3477.15

tau-muon mass ratio  $m_{\rm \tau}/m_{\rm \mu}$
 Value 16.8167

Since the muon and tau are simply more energetic electrons, it seems like if these were actual particles, we should be able to find an equation that predicts their masses based upon first principles and fundamental Planck constants.  

To do this, we will have to look more deeply into the muon and tau particles.  We are having great success so far at applying Haramein's Holographic Solution, and the approach will either solve for the masses of these other particles, or explain what is wrong with The Standard Model.

Since this work is too large to fit in the margin of this post, we'll do it over the next few posts, and months, until some resolution is made.

The writing is already on the wall that The Standard Model has missed the boat, while at the same time MISSING a whole lot of things that really matter.

That's all for now.


The Surfer, OM-IV

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Another Equation for Proton to Electron Mass Ratio???






$$\mu={m_p\over m_e}={2\phi m_{\ell}\over {\phi_em_{\ell}/2\alpha}}=4\alpha{\phi\over\phi_e}=4\alpha{a_0\over r_p}=1836.15267...$$
Compare to:
$$\mu={\alpha^2\over{\pi r_pR_{\infty}}}=1836.15267...$$
$\mu=$ proton to electron  mass ratio
$m_p=$ mass of proton
$m_e=$ mass of electron
$\phi={\eta\over R}$ Holographic ratio for proton
$\phi_e={\eta_e\over R_e}$ Holographic ratio for electron
$m_{\ell}=$ Planck mass
$a_0=$ Bohr radius
$r_p=$ proton radius (muonic hydrogen proton radius)
$R_{\infty}=$ Rydberg constant

Google calculator link and results snapshot:
((4 * fine-structure constant * hbar) / (m_e * c * fine-structure constant)) / (((4 * hbar) / c) / m_p) =
1 836.15267


CODATA value for proton-electron mass ratio:
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?mpsme
proton-electron mass ratio  $m_{\rm p}/m_{\rm e}$
 Value 1836.152 673 89
 Standard uncertainty    0.000 000 17
  Relative standard uncertainty  9.5 x 10-11
 Concise form 1836.152 673 89(17)    


There remain a few issues to be ironed out as Haramein's paper, The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution, reports the proton to electron mass ratio as:
$$\mu={m_p\over m_e}={2\phi m_{\ell}\over {\phi_em_{\ell}/2\alpha}}=4\alpha{\phi\over\phi_e}=1836.942579077855...$$

So, the work continues to understand this difference...

This result, the 1836.94259077855... above, is calculated using the CODATA value for $\alpha$, the 2013 muonic hydrogen charge radius in the $phi$ calculation, and $phi_e=6.108458512E-25$ .  See Google Drive Excel File for calculations.

More in upcoming post: Another Equation for Proton to Electron Mass Ratio!!! #2

The Surfer, OM-IV

Saturday, August 13, 2016

The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution #2

Sword of Science - SoS

...continuing with Haramein's The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution:
Let's examine the expression for the electron mass and go through the exercise of how to put numbers to the equations and compare the results to CODATA measurements and previous mainstream theoretical predictions and analysis.
$$m_e={1 \over 2\alpha}\phi_e m_\ell$$
$m_e=$ mass of the electron
$m_\ell=$ Planck mass
$\phi_e={\eta_e\over R_e}=$ electron Holographic ratio
$\eta_e=$ Surface entropy
$R_e=$ Volume entropy
$\alpha=$ fine-structure constant

The subscript "e", for electron, is to emphasize that the $\eta_e$ and $R_e$ are to be calculated for the electron, using the confined electron's Bohr hydrogen radius atomic volume and the surface area to calculate $\eta$ and $R$.

Let's do $\eta$, the surface entropy first:
$$\eta=\eta_e$$
$$\eta_e={A_{e-surface}\over A_{eq}}$$
$$A_{e-surface}=4\pi {a_{0}}^2$$
$$A_{eq-PSU}=\pi {r_{\ell}}^2$$
$a_0=$ Bohr hydrogen radius - distance electron is away from proton center
$r_{\ell}$ is the Planck radius of the PSU
$r_{\ell}={\ell\over 2}$
$\ell=$ Planck length
$A_{e-surface}$ is the surface area of a sphere of radius $a_0$, the Bohr radius.
$A_{eq-PSU}$ is the equatorial cross-sectional area of the Planck Spherical Unit (PSU).

$$\eta=\eta_e={4\pi {a_{0}}^2\over \pi {r_{\ell}}^2}$$

$R_e$, the volume entropy is next:
$$R_e={V_e\over V_{PSU}}$$
$$R_e={{4\over3}\pi a_0^3\over {4\over3}\pi r_{\ell}^3}={a_0^3\over r_{\ell}^3}$$

And finally:
$$\phi_e={\eta_e\over R_e}$$
$$\phi_e={4r_{\ell}\over a_0}$$
$$m_e={{1\over2\alpha}\phi_em_{\ell}}$$





Google link for m_e - mass of electron
electron mass =
9.10938356 × 10-31 kilograms

CODATA Link to M_e electron mass
electron mass  $m_{\rm e}$
 Value 9.109 383 56 x 10-31 kg
 Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 11 x 10-31 kg
  Relative standard uncertainty  1.2 x 10-8
 Concise form 9.109 383 56(11) x 10-31 kg    

Check!!!  Another success of Haramein's holographic approach.

Some further simplifications/reductions:
$$m_e={{1\over2\alpha}{4r_{\ell}\over a_0}m_{\ell}}$$
$$m_e={\ell m_{\ell}\over\alpha  a_0}$$
$$\ell=\sqrt{\hbar G \over c^3}$$
$$m_{\ell}=\sqrt{\hbar c\over G}$$
$${\ell}m_{\ell}={\hbar\over c}$$

$$m_e={\hbar\over c\alpha  a_0}$$
$$a_0={\hbar\over m_ec\alpha}$$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_radius

The Surfer, OM-IV

Friday, August 12, 2016

The Revolution in Particle Physics continues!!!



It will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.  A few recent online articles mention a third verification of the proton radius problem, physics definately is in trouble:


Two areas will be opened by the unified physics:
  1. Gravitational control (anti-grav)
  2. ZPE, or energy extraction from the vacuum (and matter creation as well)
And look at all of the long unsolved physics problems and mysteries and paradoxes that are slowly, step by step, being explained by the unified physics of Haramein.

The Revolution in Particle Physics continues!!!
The Surfer, OM-IV

Nassim Haramein: The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution #1


Nassim Haramein and Amira K. F. Val Baker have written a paper that extends Haramein's holographic mass technique/approach to the electron.  This approach is derived from first principles and fundamental Planck units based on a geometric and informetric/entropic ratios. 


From http://hiup.org/publications/: (link to Haramein's publication)

The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution

Haramein, N & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution, ATINER 4th International Conference of Physics: Abstract Book, Page 14


Let's look at the black hole, proton, and the new electron mass equations, in general form before we break it down into specifics:
$$m_{BH}={m_\ell \over \phi}$$
$$m_p={2\phi m_\ell}$$
$$m_e={1 \over 2\alpha}\phi_e m_\ell$$
$m_{BH}=$ Schwarzschild mass of the black hole
$m_p=$ mass of the proton
$m_e=$ mass of the electron
$m_\ell=$ Planck mass
$\phi={\eta\over R}=$ Holographic ratio
$\phi_e={\eta\over R}=$ electron Holographic ratio
$\eta=$ Surface entropy
$R=$ Volume entropy
$\alpha=$ fine-structure constant
The general form for mass is:
$$mass=f(\phi)m_\ell$$
where we simply need to know the function of $\phi$ required for the object in question. Determining this function phi requires a little insight into the nature of the object and the geometric and informetric ratios.  This is an area we'll explore more later.
The solution for the electron proceeds exactly the same as for the black hole and the proton, basically calculating $\eta$ and $R$ using the Bohr radius, $a_0$, for the electron.  Details are in the paper linked above, and we will go over it more in later posts.
Significantly, in addition to the electron mass, Haramein has provided new, more accurate DERIVATIONS of the Rydberg constant, fine-structure constant, and proton to electron mass ratio equation and the derivation and his approach gives insight into the origin and nature of the constants and may even be able to address "discrepancies between experimental and theoretical values."
This cannot be emphasized enough how significant it is, the insight Haramein's analysis gives into these constants and the source and nature of mass of matter.
Over the next few posts we'll go into more detail, as this is enough for now. 

The Revolution in Particle Physics continues!!!
The Surfer, OM-IV


Saturday, August 6, 2016

COLD FUSION DISCOVERY

FYI:  #ColdFusion #LENR is for real.  This "new" effect has been suppressed by the "mainstream".

The mainstream scientist can't explain how it works because it requires the new physics to understand how it works.  (Nassim Haramein's theory combined with Dan Winter's optimization).

This technology is useful, however, there other other ZPE devices possible in the framework of the new physics that the mainstream is ignoring.

(the new physics is almost the same as the old mainstream physics, it simply requires a few new basic "assumptions" that connect everything - the big and the small)

It is a #transmutation process #Alchemy is for real. #Newton.

SPECIAL REPORT: GOV'T HIDING COLD FUSION DISCOVERY


For a mainstream scientist to quickly see how the "threshold" of the reaction can be attained, consider phonons, phononic vibrations shaking the matrix, and the density of the matrix is the aether, with a density of the Planck mass to the Planck Spherical Units volume (PSU) which is VERY HIGH DENSITY of ENERGY per volume, so a little shaking goes along way interacting with the catalytic like doping layers that assist the Hydrogen transmutation to He, as well as other transmutations.

It's ideas like this that power James Gilliland's ships.


The Surfer, OM-IV


Friday, July 29, 2016

Additional Notes on Full Derivation of Proton to Electron Mass Ratio

The derivation used a combination of this approach I've outlined by inspecting Maxwell's and Schrodinger's equations AND as I mentioned in later posts, a mathematical approach:

http://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2016/03/derivation-of-proton-to-electron-mass.html

All that combined, then one can reproduce all the steps. And if I recall correctly, the equations really behind this are Maxwell's equations with a modification I made to examine both proton and electron, thus, in my opinion, the Electric Universe Theory is key to be included with the new unified physics.


Thunderbolts of the Gods | Official Movie


Oh, yes, and VERY BIG NEWS!!! To be reported on by the end of this year.  Nassim Haramein has applied his technique to the electron AND GETS VERY ACCURATE ANSWERS that agree with electron mass measurements.  He also mentioned the eso-teric proton to electron mass ratio equation, consciouness, and a lot more.  His papers and analysis will be made available later this year according to the Live with Nassim talk at about 1 hour into the video (Resonace Academy members only - link at side of blog for those interested and I get a percentage to help support this blog).


The Surfer, OM-IV


Wednesday, July 6, 2016

The Connected Universe | Nassim Haramein | TEDxUCSD


The Connected Universe | Nassim Haramein | TEDxUCSD

"It's a whole new world!" -Simon, when a new version of Minecraft comes out.  Likewise, when Haramein's physics gets out.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Friday, June 17, 2016

CITD 2016 Contact in the Desert UFO sighting

David Wilcock and Corey Goode at CITD 2016 in Joshua Tree, CA.

I was at CITD again this year and witnessed the light orb UFOs.  We saw about 8 of them over a 10 minute period.  The sighting was discussed on Jimmy Church's Fade2Black show #467 & #468 as well as on Coast to Coast AM June 11th show.

Here is a link to the videos.  The second video is of the second green orb we saw:

Mark

PS: BTW, David Wilcock's presentation at CITD "Preparing for Ascension" was the most complete story of mankind ever, tying together science, spirituality, our history and where we're going.  His shows on http://www.gaia.com/ are fantastic as well:

#CITD #UFO #SSP #ICC #SSPA

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Derivation of Proton to Electron Mass Ratio Equation from the Rydberg Equation

$$\mu={m_p\over m_e}=1836.15267\dots$$
$$m_e={2R_{\infty}h\over c\alpha^2}$$
$$m_e{\alpha^2\over R_{\infty}}={2h\over c}$$
$$m_e{\alpha^2\over \pi R_{\infty}}={2h\over \pi c}$$
Let $r_e={\alpha^2\over\pi R_{\infty}}$, then:
$$m_er_e={2h\over\pi c}$$
Now, because for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, for every force there is an equal and opposite force, for every torque, there is an equal and opposite torque, equate $m_pr_p$ to $m_er_e$ to balance torque/spin between proton and electron:
$$m_er_e={2h\over\pi c}=m_pr_p$$
$$\therefore {m_p\over m_e}={r_e\over r_p}={\alpha^2\over\pi r_pR_{\infty}}=1836.15267$$
Where:
$$m_pr_p={2h\over\pi c}=4\ell m_{\ell}$$
$$r_p=0.841235640294664\;fm$$
$m_p=$ proton mass
$m_e=$ electron mass
$r_p=$ proton radius
$r_e=$ effective torque arm radius for electron
$\alpha=$ fine-structure constant
$h=$ Planck constant
$c=$ speed of light
$R_{\infty}=$ Rydberg constant
$\ell=$ Planck length
$m_{\ell}=$ Planck mass
QED.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Sunday, February 7, 2016

PDF: Proton to Electron Mass Ratio Paper Points to New Physics


Google Drive Link to PDF  <-- short paper on the Proton to Electron Mass Ratio

The Surfer, OM-IV

Saturday, February 6, 2016

One Pager: Proton to Electron Mass Ratio and Conclusion of Proton Radius Puzzle


Equation for the proton to electron mass ratio:
$$\mu={m_p\over m_e} = {\alpha^2\over\pi r_pR_H}=1836.15267$$
$m_p=$ mass of proton
$m_e=$ mass of electron
$\alpha=$ fine-structure constant
$r_p=$ radius of proton
$R_H=$ Rydberg constant

comes from combining the Rydberg equation for electron mass:
$$m_e={2R_Hh\over c\alpha^2}$$
$c=$ speed of light
$h=$ Planck's constant

with Nassim Haramein's equation for the proton mass-radius relationship:
$$m_pr_p=4\ell m_{\ell}$$
$\ell=\sqrt{\hbar G\over c^3}=$ Planck length
$m_{\ell}=\sqrt{\hbar c\over G}=$ Planck mass
$\hbar={h\over 2\pi}$ = Reduced Planck's constant
$G=$ Universal Gravitational constant

CODATA value for ${m_p\over m_e}=1836.15267389(17)$

calculated mass ratio using my derived equation:
1836.15267(421379) <- only good to 9 digits due to limited resolution of CODATA for fundamental constants.

(By the way, this is confirmation to the resolution of the proton radius puzzle:
$$r_p=0.841235640294664 fm$$ )
Mark Rohrbaugh - February 6, 2016

The Surfer, OM-IV